Biomarkers come in many shapes and sizes. It’s an ever-evolving subject with many under-discovered possibilities. Let’s look at some ways biomarkers are likely to evolve. Whether we’re talking about how to gather data, how to analyse the collected data, or new ways to conduct your newly developed test – we’ve got you covered. These insights could play a massive role in the success of your biomarker.
Let’s start with a surprising – but true – statement: people diagnosed with HIV have a longer life expectancy than those who don’t. Most of us don’t expect this to be true, but it makes sense when you really think about it. HIV patients have yearly medical check-ups. During those check-ups, their entire physical status gets evaluated. If something looks abnormal, doctors can act fast. Usually, healthy people only go to a doctor when they feel ill. In some cases, by then it’s already too late. Cancer can be present for a couple of years, and before you notice it, it might already be too late.
The future of data collection plays a massive role here. People think it’s a huge effort to go to the doctor’s office every year. There must be more efficient ways to monitor someone’s health, right? A lot of research & development points in the direction of liquid biopsies. Why bother going to the hospital to give a urine sample? In the future, we can imagine seeing automatic biomarkers detectors inserted into toilets at home. This way, home toilets measure the most indicative health metrics on a daily basis. The toilet will warn the patient when it spots something shady in their urine. It will tell them when to see a doctor before it’s too late.
We predict that wearables will also play a massive role in the future of data collection. Live diagnostics provide you with a large amount of data: heart rate, oxygen levels, blood pressure, temperature, etc. This comes in handy when you’re developing a drug. If you give your test panel a smartwatch that can measure these values, you can now monitor more closely how your drug affects the subject. Besides drug development, these wearables also give valuable information to individuals. It might warn them when they’re falling sick before they notice it themself.
The amounts and types of data generated are ever-evolving. Today, almost everything can be measured. This is an advantage for biomarker development: more data means more diagnostic opportunities. But the growing amount of data also comes with a challenge. Analysing large amounts of data can by tricky. There are more variables to take into account, and that can be possibly overlooked.
Today, common practice is to combine a person’s clinical data with the information that a biomarker gives you. This is called multimodality testing. Additionally, you can add images and digital biomarkers to further enhance the diagnostic potential. Artificial intelligence (AI) will plays a huge role in the future evolution of diagnostics. Where a radiologist makes decisions based on a couple of thousand images they have seen during their lifetime, AI has built its predictive knowledge on hundreds of thousands of images. This makes AI better at recognising less obvious differences in medical scans (like RX, MRI, etc.) than the average radiologist, therefore improving diagnostic resolution.
And using AI, you will be able to combine all this information to get clearer answers that you wouldn’t have reached otherwise.
In the present day world, most of the time, people need to go to a doctor or a hospital to get tested. It’s important to think about whether this makes sense in today’s world. Why would you go to a place where people come together when they are sick or in a weakened physical state? The risk of getting or spreading diseases is way higher in this environment, not to mention the development of multi-drug resistant diseases.
In comes a perfect solution: near-patient testing, in which people get their testing kits mailed to their homes, test themselves, and send their samples back. Remote sampling removes the need to go to a hospital or any other place where people come together when they are already sick.
Some risks do come with this type of sampling. Can you trust people to take their own tests? Let’s say that you need a throat swab. This is a simple test to take, however, it is very uncomfortable for the patient. In this case, a patient can easily perform the test incorrectly in order to save themselves the discomfort. Currently, we are still seeing doctors because they guarantee a correct test.
Tele-testing is a time-saving solution that can be combined with remote sampling. Through an online meeting, a doctor can guide a patient while they are performing their tests. This way, the doctor can guide more tests within a day, and the patient doesn’t have to come to a high-risk environment.
In summary: the field of biomarker research is constantly changing, and so is everything around it, from gathering data to performing tests. As a result, great opportunities will arise, but so will some challenges.
In our opinion, the biggest challenge will be with handling the data. This makes or breaks the whole project. BioLizard specialises in strategically investigating your biological data. With extensive knowledge and experience in biological sciences as well as machine learning approaches, we add valuable insight that improves your biomarker development.